Over the years, numerous leaders and philosophers have contributed to the diverse interpretations and applications of communism as a political and economic ideology. Platonic Communism and Modern Communism are two prominent varieties of communism that have received considerable discussion. While they both share certain fundamental ideas, they also show significant ideological and pragmatic disparities.
Similarities:-
1:-
Ignorance of Individuality and State Supremacy:
Both Platonic and contemporary communism place a strong
emphasis on the primacy of the group over personal interests. They support a
robust, centralised government with substantial control over society and the
economy.
2:-
Possession of social life:
Both ideologies aim to control many facets of a person's
social life, such as their education, employment, and cultural practises, in
order to harmonise them with governmental objectives and foster a sense of
community among residents.
3:-Promotion of Unity and Harmony:
Both Platonic and Modern communism share the goal of
building a society free of class divisions, where harmony and peace reign among
the populace and inspire a feeling of shared purpose.
4:-Elimination
of Economic Inequality:
Both types of communism aspire to achieve a more fair
distribution of income and resources by minimising or eliminating economic
imbalances between various social classes.
5:-
Refusing to Accept Personal Property:
Both Platonic and contemporary communism oppose the idea
of private property ownership and support community ownership, which ensures
that resources are shared by all.
6:-
Recognition of Social Classes:
Both ideologies acknowledge that there are different classes
in society and offer solutions to deal with these divisions, despite the fact
that they both want to eliminate class disparities.
7:-
Obstacles to Human Nature:
Critics contend that both Platonic and Modern communism
fall short in certain important ways when it comes to understanding human
psychology and emotions, which makes it difficult for them to be implemented
successfully.
8:-
Practicality Questions:
Both types of communism have come under fire for what is thought to be their widespread impracticality. These systems' viability has been questioned due to implementation difficulties and potential clashes with human nature.
Dissimilarities:
1:-Property Distribution:
The way that Platonic and Modern Communism distribute property
is a key distinction between the two ideologies. While Modern Communism
encourages equal property distribution among all social levels, Platonic
Communism forbids the ruling class from possessing individual property.
2:-Completeness
of Equality:
Because it excludes a wealthy governing class, Platonic
Communism is frequently viewed as a partial type of communism, whereas Modern
Communism promises a more complete society of equality.
3:-Impact
on Family Life:
While Modern Communism generally permits more freedom in
familial arrangements, Platonic Communism places restrictions on personal
property ownership and family life.
4:-Qualifications
for Political Power:
In Platonic Communism, only philosophers and defenders
are eligible to hold political office, but in Modern Communism, all members of
society are theoretically eligible to do so.
5:-Treatment
of Resources:
While Modern Communism promotes equal distribution of
resources, including precious metals, Platonic Communism prevents rulers from
holding gold and silver.
6:-Economic
Control:
While both philosophies incorporate state control to
differing degrees, Modern Communism expressly subordinates the means of
production to the state, whereas Platonic Communism does not.
7:-Basis of Ideology:
While the basic tenet of Modern Communism revolves around
economic principles, it also has important political implications, Platonic
Communism's core focus is essentially political.
8:-Practicality and Implementation:
Due to its restrictions, Platonic Communism is frequently
seen as being practically hard to put into practise on a wide scale. In
contrast, Modern Communism has been implemented in a number of communist
countries, albeit with various degrees of success and difficulties.
In conclusion, the contrast between Platonic and Modern
Communism emphasises the complexity and variety of communist ideology as a
whole. Although both ideologies have some similar principles, there are
important practical contrasts between them in how resources are distributed,
how equality is viewed, and how they are treated. Understanding these
variations will help us better understand the potentials and difficulties of
adopting various communist systems in diverse societal settings.
0 Comments